24 Jun
2016
24 Jun
'16
5:10 p.m.
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:06:54 +0100
james <james(a)mansionfamily.plus.com> wrote:
On 24/06/2016 14:38, Chris Caudle wrote:
I don't think that's right, as surely the ground would then act as an extended
baffle.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
On Fri, June 24, 2016 6:33 am, Michael Jarosch
wrote:
Or you can put the speaker on (or in) the ground pointing up,
and
suspend the microphone. >As long as I know, the tools you mentioned
are not made for my purposes
>as the room is explicitly included in the measurement, because in the
>end speaker AND room is what to be linearized, frequency wise. I need
>something different: The speaker itself, in the best case without the
>influence of a room surrounded.
The traditional way of doing that is by
measuring outdoors in a field.
You still get a reflection from the ground even if there are no trees or
fences nearby, so you either try to minimize that by placing the
microphone very close to the ground, or place both speaker and microphone
on a stand a meter or two tall so that the ground reflection is attenuated
a little.
-- Chris Caudle