26 Jan
2006
26 Jan
'06
10:56 a.m.
Joe Hartley escribe:
In a side by side test, I _think_ my old ears hear the
slightest of
differences between recordings done at 24/96 and those done at 16/44
Are you sure that those differences are based on the sampling
frequency?
but in the end, I decided to save the disk space and
always record
at 16/44
That's a wise decision.
since everything I do is going to get resampled to
that anyway for
CDs.
As everything should be dithered while mastering, I would not worry
about resampling. Please note that I focus my comments on bit depth
more than in sampling frequency.
Cordially, Ismael
--
Tout fourmille de commentaries, d'auteurs il en est grande chert�
http://lamediahostia.blogspot.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ivalladt/