17 Nov
2010
17 Nov
'10
10:19 p.m.
On 11/17/10 21:43, Eric Steinberg wrote:
I have never noticed any artifacts with downconverting
of samplerate, except
on lower-quality Windows conversion software and early versions of Steinberg
Wavelab (no relation!). Upconversion is another story....is there a quick
and easy way to measure if conversion artifacts are present in an audio
file?
"quick and easy" - I don't think so.
http://src.infinitewave.ca/ provides a nice analysis of SRC code.
Note that 'libsamplerate' is filed under 'secret rabbit code' there.
best,
robin
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Paul Davis
<paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>wrote;wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Eric Steinberg
<eric.steinberg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Thomas, why do you use 88.2k as your
samplerate? Just curious; I use
44.1 if I'm going to CD, 48 if I'm doing pro video, and 96 or 192 if I
want
really high fidelity- but I've never used
88.2.
its 2x 44.1 so that resampling to CD format is very artifact free, but
you get the benefits of a higher SR.