27 May
2005
27 May
'05
12:59 p.m.
On Fri, 27 May 2005 07:38:37 -0700, Kevin Cosgrove <kevinc(a)doink.com>
wrote:
On 27 May 2005 at 10:03, "Peter Lutek" <plutek(a)infinity.net> wrote:
thanks, kevin.... yup, i'm on the ardour list, but am ok with the ardour
side of things. incidentally, you don't need a plugin for the
metering..... the ardour mixer shows peaks in each strip, and is now
globally resettable (ctrl-click in any channel peak box resets all
channels). yes, i'm using an rme multiface (8 analog, 8 adat, 2spdif).
-p
i'm wondering what you all would recommend as
the least
resource-consuming
(in terms of cpu/memory usage) method for multitrack recording. i need
to
record 18 channels (each to its own file) of 44.1kHz float audio in a
live
setting, while simultaneously running some looping and FX, so i'd like
to
keep the recording chain as lean as possible.
curiously, my tests have shown significantly lower average system load
using ardour than using ecasound. i was surprised by this, having
assumed
that ecasound would be the solution. so now i'm wondering if other
options
might be even better than ardour. maybe a recorder built in pd? i do
need
metering, preferably with resettable peak indicators.
I'd go with ardour. There are some LADSPA plugin meters that
will do what you want. I too find ardour to have surprisingly
light load on my 2GHz Celeron with 1GB of RAM. What soundcard(s)
are you using for your 18 channels? I'm using an 8ch M-audio
Delta 1010. I expect you might need/have RME gear with all of
those channels. Join the ardour list if you want to learn more
about that.