Re: [LAU] Good, efficient compressor in LADSPA and/or SLV2?

I'd second, or is it third by now, the SC4. Not that I'm in any way particularly experienced with compressors or compression, but I find the visual feedback on the amount of gain reduction to be useful. Compress by all means, but crush, no. If there is little or no dynamic range in the mix, the mastering engineer has nothing to work with and by the time broadcast engineers have slapped all their processing on things it will sound loud but weak. As Bob Katz says, it's not how loud you make it, it's how you make it loud. Lots of little bits of compression will sound better than slamming everything hard to try and get the mix to compare with a mastered and broadcast piece. Personally I don't have an issue with compression, it's an important tool for certain things, like getting a nice fluid, sustaining guitar solo sound, or evening out a bass part so that doesn't disappear from the bottom of a busy mix, getting toms to boom and so on. Although that is all from a rock perspective. But yes, I find the OVER-compression, heavily brickwall limited, "what this music REALLY needs is to be a square wave!" approach incredibly tiring on the ears. Of course, there are ways and means of compressing things without damaging the transients and the subtleties of attacks. Q PS In the time it's taken to write this I'm now on to fourthing the SC4 and I've been beaten to the call about broadcast processing! Ken Restivo wrote: