27 Jun
2005
27 Jun
'05
2:25 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote:
Yes, the desire to keep some algorithms simple is one good reason to use
96 kHz. I do it as well in Aeolus, where parts of some of the wavetables are
computed at 2, 3 or 4 the output sample rate, to allow linear interpolation
at run time.
--
FA
This seems
like a sensible idea, but one could wonder why in that case
the sample frequency needs to be 96 kHz (*).
Well, the argument i often heard and which IMHO does make sense is that
when heavy processing is used the higher samplerate keeps many artefacts
out of the audible range for a longer time than with 48khz for example.