18 Feb
2013
18 Feb
'13
9:44 p.m.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:36 PM, <jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com> wrote:
If a better response time from the kernel is something
that's Good, why
isn't lowlatency kernels a default in Linux distros (well, at least in Linux
Mint and Fedora) If it is So Good, what are the arguments for not having a
lowlatency kernel by default ? Any drawbacks ? I presume the
Audio-oriented Linux distros do have lowlatency kernels by default, do they
?
Ubuntu Studio uses low-latency kernel by default, and I am pretty sure
some of the other multimedia distros do also.
--
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,
it would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi