7 Jun
2006
7 Jun
'06
4:14 p.m.
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 10:12 +0200, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 13:39:31 -0400
Lee Revell <rlrevell(a)joe-job.com> wrote:
That's an incorrect useage, those people are wrong ;-)
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 11:10 -0400, Joshua Boyd
wrote:
Don't some people refer to the maximum static SCHED_FIFO prio as
"realtime priority". I have CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL on.
My application runs
with SCHED_FIFO and has an elevated priority, but not realtime
priority. When I tried setting it to realtime priority it grinds the
networking, control panel, and VGA display applications to a halt.
Uhhh, SCHED_FIFO and "realtime priority" are the same thing.
Can you be more specific? What was it again 99? or 100?
99.
Lee