7 Nov
2003
7 Nov
'03
12:06 p.m.
On Friday 07 November 2003 09:43 am, Austin wrote:
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 10:31, Brian Redfern wrote:
More is always better, but jackd runs without complaint alongside Hydrogen,
zynAddSubFX, and Ardour, on my system with 256. If you've got a few extra
dollars, putting some more memory in couldn't hurt things, but 256 has been
adequate for me :)
|)
|)enji
Also is 256 megs of ram enough to run jackd well,
or do I
need more like 500megs or more?
Since you'll want to mount /tmp in ram, more is better. I've monitored
mine (with 500 MB), and it never seems to fill up, so I think that's
adequate.