30 Jul
2004
30 Jul
'04
4:36 p.m.
On Friday 30 July 2004 05:38 am, Dave Griffiths wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:29:04 -0400, Rob wrote
-snip-
FWIW this ladspa only softsynth is something I've been itching to do for
ages, I think it's a really good idea. Maybe it would require some
specialist LADSPA plugins that would be needed for a softsynth, but I think
this is where the functionality belongs, rather than in client code.
[screeching tires] Where can I find out more about this? What's it called?
After my recent experiments I'd recommend leaving the GUI out of the
picture for as long as possible, and implementing it in a scripting
language instead of C++ - I find it a much more productive way of
developing, plus your software is availible for people who don't want or
can't use GUIs with no extra work.
cheers,
dave