15 Mar
2004
15 Mar
'04
5:18 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:48:05PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 10:21:00 +0100, Frank
Barknecht wrote:
Waveform Similarity Overlap Add?
http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/courseware/cs298/spring00/Ponceleon/Dulce/index4.h…
(not that i can claim to understand that picture ... :-/ )
-Eric Rz.
Hallo,
Erik de Castro Lopo hat gesagt: // Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Soundtouch uses WSOLA, which is similar to granular synthesis, its not
fequency domain like FFT or wavelets.
- Steve On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:21:01 -0500
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <rzewnickie(a)rfa.org> wrote:
I think, Soundtouch uses a Fourier-based approach. Granular synthesis
isn't really the best method of clean time stretching, I just
mentioned it as one example of a technique, that can be used to do
extreme streches. For the purposes of time stretching or
compressing sound, how does it compare to the way Erik's SRC or
SoundTouch work?
SoundTouch is a true pithc independant time stretcher.