16 Feb
2013
16 Feb
'13
4:53 p.m.
Hi :)
first off all, it might be another thread, I was to fast with deleting
mail from a temporary storage, but by one of the mails I was asked
regarding to my ambivalent claims, regarding to NVIDIA and ATI. The FLOSS
driver's name is radeon. I won't explain this ambivalence right now,
interpret it as "there are drawbacks by graphics of both vendors, but
there's no alternative for my purse".
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 15:38:01 +0100, Joe Hartley <jh(a)brainiac.com> wrote:
Were you trying to install a new system or update an
existing one?
The existing one was a mess, thanks to "the transition", so I deleted the
old install and I want to set up a new install.
_Fedora_ btw. is a distro I won't run, because I don't like to handle
RPMs, I still have Sues 11.2 and started using Linux with Suse 9.0. I
prefer pacman, followed by DEB.
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:50:53 +0100, Folderol <folderol(a)ukfsn.org> wrote:
For some time now, and for work as well as home office
& DAW, I install
the absolutely minimum debian
That is something I'll test too, but while I'm only able to maintain
around two installs, I'm also limited to the amount of distros I seriously
can test, so for now I'll test Arch Linux, assumed installing Arch should
work. Fortunately the German Forums are ok. IMO it's a drawback that the
mailing list is badly moderated.
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:34:00 +0100, James Stone <jamesmstone(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Out of interest, what problems do you have with ubuntu
studio?
It's buggy as hell, the LTS still is ok, but Quantal already is a PITA and
Ubuntu seems to go a way, I'm not willing to go. I'm not interested in app
shops, Amazon etc.. Even if you can't find it for Ubuntu Studio, it's
based on a distro that does go this way. FWIW Quantal from the Ubuntu
Studio install media is more buggy, than Quantal from the Ubuntu install
media + Xfce and the studio meta packages on my machine.
Regards,
Ralf