14 Jun
2008
14 Jun
'08
5:45 p.m.
Roger E skrev:
Svend-Erik Kjær Madsen wrote:
Ok, I've got an RME Multiface, but if I use a samplerate of 96000 my
ADAT is no good.
/Sv-e
lør, 14 06 2008 kl. 13:48 +1000, skrev Roger E:
I've attached a png snapshot of my Jack settings. Just about to leave
for work or I'd send text. (or which text file has these?)
I think my secret is using an M-Audio Audophile 2496.
And the kernels in an updated testing (Lenny atm) seem to get more
audio-friendly over time so stable (Etch atm) may be a little harder.
Then again Musix is based on Etch and works great.
Cheers,Roger
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You're bound to get some comments on a post
like that!
I agree that studio64 is probably the best. I don't use Suse on the
getting in bed with the devil principle. But I also prefer Kde or
Xfce to Gnome.
The latest Musix is very impressive, though maybe not really cutting
edge. dyne:bolic is very cool.
However I make most music on my everyday Debian/kde testing, which
is updated regularly. No RT kernel like Studio64 or Musix etc., but
Jack still runs nice with about 6ms latency on the vanilla kernel.
And no rebooting after browsing, mailing or killing evil zombies in
a 3d game. :)
Roger
Hi Roger
Could you share the secret behind getting a plain debian running
"stable" round 6ms without any other apps affecting the invironment ?
I guess if you have found the right settings it does not matter which
desktop to choose ?
/Sv-e
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user