On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:12:27 -0600
Jan Depner <eviltwin69(a)cableone.net> wrote:
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 07:00, Florian Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:02:28 -0800 (PST)
R Parker <rtp405(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
I'm hesitant about returning to ext2 because
I've had
fsck blow up in my face more than once...guess that's
why I rsync to a big IDE HD. I do expect ext2
performance to be perfectly acceptable.
what's wrong with ext3?
The hournal is not with the file. This causes problems when the
file is written to.
what kind of problems? You mean, because the journal is on another part
of the disk, the head has to move a lot while writing? (writing data -
updating journal - writing data - updating journal...)
flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://affenbande.org/~tapas/