On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 11:59 -0500, Paul Davis
wrote:
there isn't a single project that
couldn't use a at least a few more developers. every single project:
Rosegarden, MuSE, Lilypond, Aldrin,
now hold it there! i don't want any of your dirty fingers on my precious
code.
no, actually, i think we are doing fine. manpower doesn't necessarily
mean faster progress. if we just keep stealing from each others codebase
(that's what gpl is about, dammit), each one of our little projects will
turn out just fine.
In our attempt to help fulfilling 'the need for every single possible
hardware interface to work', we could use some helping hands. I'm pretty
confident that we're better off with a lot of (possibly dirty-handed)
coders + some good maintainers than with the current situation where 3
spare-time coders do it all. The current situation does help for
satisfying my personal need for eternal glory and unlimited kudos...
We should keep in mind that we're all doing it for fun (I hope) and that
most of us don't make a living out of this. Concentration of these
spare-time development efforts would be nice, but it doesn't seem to be
working that way.
My personal feeling is that the initial effort to learn somebody else's
code is the main bottleneck towards entering a project. Sometimes people
think they can do it better, or that it will be easier to do a complete
rewrite. And sometimes they are right (e.g. ZynAddSubFX).