30 Mar
2005
30 Mar
'05
5:50 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 03:17:06PM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:38:39PM +0300, Kai Vehmanen
wrote:
Um ... sorry I was referring to the LAD list, not LAU. LAU hadn't been
started yet in 2000. But, presumably when the LAU list was started up
its archives got the same treatment the LAD list has had since 2000.
--
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki | Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division | Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW | Washington, DC 20036 | 202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network(a)rfa.org.
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Arnold Krille wrote:
As maintainer of the "official" archive, we do hide email
addresses in the
archives - please see latest archives for examples at:
http://lalists.stanford.edu/lau/2005/03/
This has been in place already for at least 3-5 years -- I cannot remember
the exact date when we started email address hiding.
It was around February or March of 2000. I wasn't on the list then, but
I've just about finished reading the March 2000 archives. The archive
was set up in Feb/Mar 2000. Its just
one way to reduce spam. I do think list managers should
protect thier users. This one doesn't?
We don't talk about "the"
list archive.