20 Dec
2015
20 Dec
'15
3:31 a.m.
I think that just about any combination these days will do the job MUCH
better than we imagined just a few years ago. I got a Gigabyte mobo a few
years ago with a Intel i5-4570 running at 3.20GHz. I sometimes sneak a look
at the cpu graphs and other than when I'm converting a video or something
equally cpu intensive, the graph seldom gets about 5% of use. And with 8gig
of RAM I don't think I've ever gone into swap.
My only complaint with the gigabyte board is that it doesn't recognize my
logictech "gaming" keyboard on boot. I think it might be the fact that it
has a usb port on the keyboard. So, if I want to access the bios I need to
plug in a different keyboard.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 00:14:47 +0100, Ede Wolf wrote:
--
**** Listen to my FREE CD at http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars ****
Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA **
EMAIL: bob(a)mellowood.ca
WWW: http://www.mellowood.ca
That's why I personally went with AMD. No HT,
no onboard/onchip Video.
Take a look at the current models for current common sockets,
especially the FM types. It seems that most of them have an integrated
graphics. It seems to be a marketing concept that supersedes AMD CPUs
without graphics soon.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user