28 Sep
2010
28 Sep
'10
2:14 p.m.
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 13:15:57 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On Mon, September 27, 2010 12:31 pm, Arnold Krille
wrote:
My issue is that it has an awfully bloated filter (which is suboptimal
according to fons) taking up a lot of cpu-power, while for me it could
perfectly to with a parametric eq (either three bands + shelve or four bands).
Have fun,
Arnold
Hi,
On Sunday 26 September 2010 02:22:21 fons(a)kokkinizita.net wrote:
Just for the sake of clarity, now the problem is that jamin doesn't have a
real parametric eq?
Or is the main issue that it uses more resources than necessary and can be
optimised? 4. To assemble a set of recorings into a coherent
whole.
(4) still valid.
* Multi-band compression. Maybe. But if that improves the result, it's
much easier to apply compression while mixing, on selected tracks. The
'multi-band' thing is there only to try and separate things again, and
usually it fails. IMHO dynamics are part of the mixing step, no excuses.
There is one exception to this rule:
When you have a stereo feed from the console and a stereo feed from room
mics,
you can't get back to "mixing" to fix the issues that you can easily fix
with
multi-band compression.
If jamin's eq was replaced with a real parametric eq, that would be cool.
It
would fix a lot of issues raised and lower the cpu-usage. *dreaming*