22 Dec
2009
22 Dec
'09
2:01 a.m.
sonofzev(a)iinet.net.au wrote:
On Mon Dec 21 19:05 , david sent:
I'm no fan of eye candy, and that's what I think 90% of the Qt4-based
KDE4 *is*. I'd rather have my music computer's processor and memory
being used for audio than eye candy. ;-)
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
Robert Jonsson wrote:
Don't rush it. Just
keep in mind that there's stuff in Qt4 that doesn't
work that works fine in Qt3, too.
--
TMany that use MusE regularly are more concerned about jackmidi and other
features that bring new functionality or interoperability. From my understanding
QT4 is more of a cosmetic update and wouldn't necessarily bring more sequencer
functionality in. (correct me if I'm wrong) However migrating could require a
major overhaul....
Robert and Tim have put in a hell of a lot of work in the past year or so and
MusE is functioning really really well. It may look a bit dated.. but that's
really not the point is it? One
suggestion (but it may be too big a deal as the KDE folks found out!), go
to the more up to date QT4.
There are no immediate plans to move, Qt3 should be
around in distros
yet for a few years. But eventually we will move. Not the least,
there's stuff in Qt4 that would be nice to use. :)