7 Mar
2006
7 Mar
'06
12:02 p.m.
--- Arnold Krille <arnold.krille(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2006/3/7, R Parker <rtp405(a)yahoo.com>om>:
That isn't necesarry, it's time consuming and time is
money. What I described with the television truck is
productions that have a requirement for good
production quality. We produce final product in the
field as a rule. Our product always meets or exceeds
the quality expectation. This is an enviroment where
zero tolerance for error is the rule. If an error,
best case can be a client that doesn't pay. The worst
case is someone loses their job.
Disclaimer:
My assertions are based on actual experience acquired
over a number of years of doing this work
professionaly. They are not college level hypotheses
so it's likely I'm to naive and belligerent to see or
admit to the shortcomings in producing final product
from live events while in the field. :)
In all seriousness productions like the one described
are done with the methods I describe.
ron
Even the
two wireless lavs
two channels of compression
one very small mixer
one small recording device
Why the mixer?
For preamping? That would be before the compressor.
For mixing? If the recorder has two channels its
better to record both
mics to separate channels and mix later. compression could be
done later if the recorder has a good input amp and
enough (digital)
headroom for low-level recordings...
In my current situation I would connect two
(wireless) lavs directly
to my tascam-usb-interface and record with
timemachine or something
similar and mix/compress later on.
My 0.002...
Arnold
--
visit http://dillenburg.dyndns.org/~arnold/
---
Wenn man mit Raubkopien Bands wie Brosis oder
Britney Spears wirklich
verhindern könnte, würde ich mir noch heute einen
Stapel Brenner und
einen Sack Rohlinge kaufen.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com