8 Sep
2005
8 Sep
'05
10:45 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:54:50AM +0200, Michael Rudolf wrote:
studio-64 wrote:
I'm able to run the digi96/8 pad at 2 periods of 256 frames at 48kHz. I
think that corresponds to ~10 ms for playback latency and ~5ms for
capture latency. That is, if I'm understanding the jackd manpage
correctly ...
Lee Revell wrote:
Well yes, they are not very clear as to the differentiation of their cards,
i.e. what card is good for what kind of use. I even got a printed ad here
where they're marketing the digi96/8 series as "the all-in-one tool for
professional harddisk recording".
He probably just got the impression that all
non-firewire RME stuff
was well supported under Linux. That's what I thought...
HI
I too thought this of RME, their website is a bit ambiguous to say the
least. I can say the cheap(!?) Hammerfall lite I have
works on all the Linux
system I have used, with very low latencies.
Still digital I/O only, right?
He should contact RME direct and let us know the
outcome, they seem to
be a Linux friendly company.
I'm not quite sure what I should expect from
them. They won't trade in my
card since I bought it used, and I'm not too positive they will supply me
with a low latency driver for Linux ;)
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > How exactly does the hardware design not play nice with ALSA? Does it
> > need variable period sizes to do low latency? It seems like the ASIO
> > drivers must be able to do < 3-5 ms on Windows or it would not be
> > marketable...