On Mon, 18 May 2009 17:01:27 +0400, alex stone <compose59(a)gmail.com> wrote:
  Marc,
 I'd be interested in hearing about your results on this little test.
 I tried it, as you've suggested, and it worked initially. But as you
 rightly say, the dbus daemon is used, and this brought up another
 challenge. When the system is rebooted, the dbus tries to assume
 priority, and i found jack was already started when i tried to open an
 instance of jack, so we're already facing a challenge just to get
 warmed up.
 After inserting the command, it worked the first time, but subsequent
 command calls didn't when restarting Qjackctl, even though the
 jack_control command was still present in Qjackctl setup as a command
 to be run before jack startup. On the contrary, jack tried to start
 but got shutdown almost immediately, and i had to remove the command,
 and run jack_control stop several times before the server finally laid
 down and died. (A Linux Warrior to the last. Make sure your enemy is
 truly out of the picture.) 
I admit it was just a blind guess. I need to test this myself and I won't
be available till tomorrow... I'll keep you posted. And again, that would
probably be just a workaround, not a long term solution.
  I've STILL yet to hear an answer to my question
though.
 Will the Jack team be continuing a completely non-dbus/pulse build for
 those who want more control over their audio environments, or are we
 to be enslaved to this new lack of choice for all eternity? (I'm sure
 the armour's going to get rusty before then.) 
Answer will be another question: who's talking about pulse ?
Marc-Olivier Barre.
------
Participez au black-out anti-HADOPI :
http://www.laquadrature.net/fr/APPEL-HADOPI-blackout-du-net-francais