22 Dec
2012
22 Dec
'12
10:53 p.m.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>wrote;wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 12:44 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
i have at least 3 ADAT equipped devices that support 44.1kHz via ADAT.
claiming that ADAT cannot support 44.1kHz is just wrong.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 09:19 -0800, Len Ovens wrote:
RME HDSPe AIO
On Sat, December 22, 2012 7:42 am, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 14:58 +0000, John Murphy wrote:
>> Synth manufacturers: Why no ADAT out?
>
> Would be nice for homestudios today, assumed there would
be cheap
cards
> with several ADAT inputs. My RME card only
has got one
ADAT, that btw.
> does not work with Linux.
and what card would that be? ADAT can do 48KHz, 96KHz and 192KHz.
Nobody will use 44.1KHz
for
pro-audio, so that wouldn't cause an issue.
the usual ralph misinformation. does it ever stop?
ADAT supports 44.1kHz and 48kHz as-is. With the S-Mux "standard", it
can route 88.2kHz and 96kHz signals, but each channel is split across
two ADAT channels, causing a 50% reduction in the number of available
channels.
Can you give an example for misinformation by me?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/013570.…
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/013572.…