8 Sep
2005
8 Sep
'05
7:43 a.m.
Hi All
Re the start of this thread,
I've been in touch with the company 'Roadnoise' and they have amended
there legalese, to bring it more into line with the Creative commons.
Just goes to show what can happen with one email to a list (it was the
Behringer V-Amp2 list on yahoo)
Cheers
Bob
Bearmusic
james(a)dis-dot-dat.net wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep, 2005 at 07:38PM +0300, Juhana
Sadeharju spake thus:
http://creativecommons.org/
--
Bearmusic
hearmymusic.co.uk <http:www.hearmymusic.co.uk>
From:
Randy Kramer <rhkramer(a)gmail.com>
* a GPL license, you are allowing a non-GPL'd fork
* a "commercial license", you are allowing them to compete with you at no
cost and with no return to you
And they could make their site completely commercial. It would be
a major job to get the same music back if that happens after many
years. Guess, people should submit their music to as many places
as possible.
What is the GPL for audio and for photos? Would that be a good idea? I'm thinking a sound effect library and a
photo library which could
be used, e.g., in games. I want that a game developer who makes
a sky texture box out of our photos would have to make his texture
box available.
I also would like to collect photos from all over the world, taken
by volunteers. The license should be good from the volunteer's
viewpoint. Their work should be credited properly. E.g., the sky box
by N.N. based on photo by M.M.
Juhana