13 Jul
2004
13 Jul
'04
3:54 p.m.
2.6 on suse is also different than 2.6 fedora, because suse has a couple
of audio programmers who work to make sure their kernel works with audio,
so I can use all my audio apps out of the box with 9.2, and the 2.6
kernel, without latency problems, and without needing a kernel recompile.
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 linux-audio-user-request(a)music.columbia.edu wrote:
Send linux-audio-user mailing list submissions to
linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
linux-audio-user-request(a)music.columbia.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
linux-audio-user-owner(a)music.columbia.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of linux-audio-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Note tuning and quantizer in audio files (Paul Winkler)
2. Re: distros (Steve Harris)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:51:13 -0400
From: Paul Winkler <pw_lists(a)slinkp.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Note tuning and quantizer in audio
files
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>
Message-ID: <20040713145112.GA2313(a)slinkp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In case anyone's interested, I just found an interesting
closely related thread on rec.audio.pro:
http://groups.google.com/groups?th=e1a8a02e65f3da0c&seekm=jmtpe0t9ru3q4…
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:02:53 +0100
From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris(a)ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] distros
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>
Message-ID: <20040713150253.GH31552(a)login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:50:52PM +0100, tim hall wrote:
Last Tuesday 13 July 2004 13:11, kmd was like:
Agreed, I would only go to 2.6 is you really need some features in it -
its basicly stopped one of my machines from being a useful audio box.
- Steve
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
linux-audio-user mailing list
linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
End of linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 10, Issue 55
************************************************
can i use the 2.6 kernel or should i use
the special compiled multimedia 2.4 kernel (for mandrake, via contrib
sources). and i have trouble as well to play with jack without being
root,
General consensus seems to be that a 2.4 multimedia kernel is the 'stable'
approach. You won't have to run Jack as root if you run a patched multimedia
kernel. You probably won't need to do a lot of tweaking. Best approach is
probably to get a working system with 2.4 and then upgrade to 2.6 only if
you're really not happy with results. Personally, I will be happy to wait
until 2.6 is more stable.