4 Nov
2004
4 Nov
'04
11:32 a.m.
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 06:25, Dave Griffiths wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:34:18 -0800, Florin Andrei
wrote
Absolutely true. Samplers are very misunderstood. Samplers can be far
more "abstract" and creative in sound synthesis IMHO. Also most
samplers (hardware ones anyway) include basic oscillators and filters
and LFO's. All of the samplers I've owned could make synth noises
without ever sampling anything or loading any samples.
-ry
Well, there's little or no point in buying a
hardware sampler if you
wanna create new sounds; i currently own an Alesis QS6.2 and, while it's
an excellent sampler on its own (high praise to Alesis for creating
an instrument that's robust, straightforward and appealing), it's
not appropriate for creating new sounds (well, no sampler is, by
definition). Some people appreciate a sampler (those who want to
play existing sounds)
To just be pedantic - but I don't get this at all, a sampler is far better for
making unique sounds surely?
You can do what you want with sounds from any source - ok, so you need a
source to begin with, but a synth is actually more restrictive as you can only
make the sounds it's capable of (even a modular), with a sampler you can make
an entire track from the sound of someone sneezing - if you have enough
creativity and time... :)
dave