16 Aug
2014
16 Aug
'14
10:49 p.m.
[Paul Davis]
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Tim Goetze
<tim(a)quitte.de> wrote:
I beg your forgiveness for my very poor choice of words, but still I
am hopeful, even certain, that this mistake of mine will not be able
to taint your habitual power of objective consideration telling you
that the current approach is inferior to Fons' proposal in a number of
ways.
Cheers, Tim
[I have to agree that this is a far more useful
approach than jack's
current "slow-sync" and I think that for jack to become a truly
professional tool the adoption of this state model is inevitable.
ignoring any details of the transport API, there isn't anything that will
make JACK a "truly professional tool".