3 Jun
2010
3 Jun
'10
11:16 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:00:11PM -0700, Ken Restivo wrote:
Last I was following this, Paul was saying fairly
consistently that jackdmp was intended to replace jackd. Newer codebase, better
implementation, C++ not C, multi-core, etc etc.
Has that position changed while I wasn't paying attention?
Apparently it has, AFAICS the result of
- personal preferences or allergies of some of the jack1
developers who would probably drop out if jack1 is
declared 'dead',
- and Sletz and the jack2 team not being too eager to
take it all on their shoulders alone.
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !