18 Jul
2007
18 Jul
'07
5:40 a.m.
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:56 -0700, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
On 18 July 2007 at 7:35, Fons Adriaensen
<fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
Is there really any audible distortion if you resample offline using a
sinc resampler with a very large window?
--ll
Same here. I normally use 24 bit 48 kHz, but 96
works fine as well.
Recording straight into Ardour.
So, what's the advantage of 48kHz over 44.1kHz? Does that advantage
outweigh whatever distortion is introduced from the sample rate
conversion going to 44.1kHz, in the event that the recording is
destined for a CD? I'm not partial to either rate, just curious
about the advantages & disadvantages.