30 Jul
2018
30 Jul
'18
3:09 a.m.
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:51:22 +0200
Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 18:05:49 -0400, jonetsu wrote:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYngev6RB_U
I fight against a tinnitus by a cortisone treatment to
get rid of such
noise. Are there people out there who enjoy listening to this kind of
sound? This is the disgusting kind of sound used for boring
documentations, done by young people, who only just finished film
academy and started working for television.
It wouldn't be surprising that it's also used by dictatorial regimes
and the CIA, showing commonalities in application.
This is nice music :), however it could be done with non-modular
synth, too.
Maybe the arrangement of sounds and modulations in this piece
might have been facilitated by all of them happening at the same time
using a unified interface.
A bit perhaps like having 5 non-modular synths with a set of
modulation-capable macros addressing several parameters on each.
One thing with non-modular synths is that they would offer a much, much
wider range of sounds.
So the idea then would be to provide a unified modulation interface that
can work with several non-modular synths while these synths themselves
would be driven by a sequencer that also can be finely modulated.