2 Aug
2004
2 Aug
'04
9:38 p.m.
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 15:15, Malcolm Baldridge wrote:
Quoting Florin Andrei <florin(a)andrei.myip.org>rg>:
Actually, i'll need 2.6 _and_ some serious low-lat capabilities for
another, non-musical, "real world" application (read: making money out
of it - not that people can't make money out of music, i'm just speaking
for myself). 2.4 won't work there.
But it wouldn't hurt to get it going on my multimedia workstation too,
so i guess it's a matter of hitting two birds with one stone, which is a
good thing... if it works. ;-)
I've not been able to follow LKML too closely
in the last few weeks, so
i'm out of loop with the recent developments. If some of you folks did
watch it, do you care to bring the rest of us up to speed WRT the latest
2.6 developments that are related to "audio" kernels?
I guess this boils down to how you want to spend your time.
You can either use your audio tools to compose and create music... or ...
you can spend your days compiling kernels and "fixing" problems which
aren't
broken. It's interesting to note how little time my Pro
Tools friends spend on their
Operating System [the "primitive" MacOS 8.6] compared to actually using
their audio tools. :) Of course, I know this is LINUX-audio, and the Linux
part comes before audio, so therefore it gets more attention than actually
making noises through the speakers. ;)
I hear you.
The thought of migrating to Mac crosses my mind every now and then, but
gets chased away quickly. :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/