8 Sep
2013
8 Sep
'13
12:03 a.m.
Oh i believe it was for stability and reliability issues.
In the past years we had "sound blackouts" on several occasions because of
technical failures
so there was a decision to go as failure proof as possible.
I believe that the non Microsoft policy was actually induced by the head of
AV department...
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)linuxaudio.org>wrote;wrote:
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:15:38PM +0300, Moshe Werner
wrote:
Actually I've got a fun fact.
When last year the Israeli parliament published the official requirements
for the new FOH system in the plenum, it stated that no Microsoft driven
console would be allowed:)
What is the (political, ethical, pragmatic, ...) motivation behind this
choice ?
I could have added security, but since plenum sessions are
(I assume) public that seems to be irrelevant.
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user