21 Feb
2004
21 Feb
'04
11:10 a.m.
Florin Andrei wrote:
sparse? rigid? these words do not describe fvwm at all. it's has
pretty much all the features a WM can have and it's also one of the most
configurable ones.
erik
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 14:05, Kent, Gary wrote:
...
I am trying
out fvwm and it is pretty sparse, but was wondering
what others might suggest as best for audio?
FVWM is kinda too sparse for my taste :-)
FluxBox is pretty good. Very small, not as rigid as FVWM, very fast, not