8 Jun
2018
8 Jun
'18
3:01 a.m.
Le Wed, 6 Jun 2018 07:01:01 +0200,
Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> a écrit :
I was not talking about conspiracy. Corps have other needs regarding
security than a home computer or a dedicated workstation. *kits and
systemd offer a way to implement these needs. And maybe it is other
reasons I don't know.
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 01:51:09 +0200, Dominique Michel
wrote:
...
How I see it is
than several leading commercial linux distributions
like redhat have huge corporations as paid customers, and these corps
need these kits stuffs and systemd, or at least they was convinced
they need it... But into a dedicated or home computer, they are just
"usines à gaz" (gas plant - these manufactures full with pipes
everywhere and going in all possible directions at the same time)
and a complete pain in the ass to manage as a result.
There is a difference between being really hit by systemd pitfalls and
baseless bikeshedding. Major distros decided to migrate to systemd for
valid reasons, it's not a conspiracy done by mentally handicapped
and/or evil distro maintainers.
Don't get me wrong, users could have good reasons to be against
systemd and/or against policykit and similar things.
I already explained them. And it is one more: I just have other things
to do with my free time than to rtfm the huge systemd documentation.
Which also pose the question of the management cost of systemd for a
corporation - they must have peoples which can manage it, or they will
have to pay some other company to manage it.
--
If you have a problem and you are not doing anything to fix it, you are
at the heart of the problem.