Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

Strange I only get this for tons of mails send to LAU: "FILE QUARANTINED ---------------- The original contents of this file have been replaced with this message because of its characteristics. File name: "Body of Message" Virus name: "EngineError"" "Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified" *?* E.g.: Your message To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org Subject: Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ? Sent: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:49:16 +0100 did not reach the following recipient(s): [1] Your message To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org Subject: Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ? Sent: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:52:51 +0100 did not reach the following recipient(s): [? perhaps the same mail already forwarded before] Regards, Ra♪f [1] -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ? Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:49:16 +0100 On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 09:30 -0500, drew Roberts wrote: bug Project mailing lists, for audio applications and distros. On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 09:34 -0500, Paul Davis wrote: If there's a good reason to subscribe to 1000 bugtrackers I do it, but really, most of the times I don't do it. If I report a bug to a mailing list, the coder/coders don't have tons of bugs to handle, why should I repeat the report. It's useful to repeat the report on a bugtracker, if the coders have to take control about tons of bugs. However, where should people report bugs with ALSA? I've seen many people asking for help, reporting bugs, without getting a reply, I often recommend those people to subscribe to LAU/LAD ;). Regards, Ralf