15 Dec
2006
15 Dec
'06
2:51 a.m.
Esben Stien:
No, the idea is very good. However, it should be of the same
quality as Dave's page. And therefore, we need all the categories
he has. (list below). Because I think the first thing to do would be to
copy all the contents from Dave's page into wikipedia.
And the question then is, will wikipedia allow us to create all
these sub-categories? (linux-audio-Demos, linux-audio-digital-dj, and so
on.)
Audio Plugins
CD Software
Csound & Cmix Helpers
Demos
Digital DJ
Documentation/Newsworthy
Drumming
DSP Software
Emulators
Effects Processors
File Compression
File Conversion
Games & Game Software
Guitar Software
Hardware + Linux
JACK
Linux Audio Bundles & Distributions
Linux Music On-line
Looping Software
Mailing Lists
MIDI Software
Mixers
MOD Trackers/Players/Resources
MPEG (MP3) Players/Encoders
Multitrack Recorders/Mixers
Music Notation
Musicians Utilities
Network Audio
OggVorbis Software
Other Sound+MIDI Pages
Other UNIX Audio and MIDI Software
Players & Recorders
Radio
Repositories & Lists
Scopes
Software Synthesis & Music Composition
Software Tools
Sound Cards & Drivers
Soundfile Editors
Sounds For Free
Speech Synthesis/Analysis
Telephony/AV Conferencing
Wikis
Why not just use Wikipedia as the main wiki?
It's an excellent idea and I've mentioned it before;). I'd like to
hear the the views of the person who created the new audio wiki and
some comment from Hans Fugal.
Is it possible to agree on this?, then have Ivica point to the
starting page of it on his site.
Do we really need three wikis' when there is no conflicting view?