30 Jun
2010
30 Jun
'10
5:29 p.m.
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 10:47:00 you wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:34 AM, drew Roberts
<zotz(a)100jamz.com> wrote:
Yup, that was a generic *your* not a particular *your*. It was meant for
everyone on the list who has issues with the current copyright situation.
A sort of money where your mouth is proposition.
all the best,
drew
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 09:31:41 Paul Davis
wrote:
absolutely agreed. my argument was meant to be in favor of the current
status quo.
making cars illegal to help bus drivers hurts car
owners. making
washing machines illegal to help washing ladies hurts owners of
washing machines. placing limits on the ability to copy someone else's
work hurts no-one if those limits are sensible.
But they are currently not sensible. Still, try the copyleft play. Put *your* art
under a Free and copyleft
license. perhaps a creative commons by-sa license. promote others who do
the same and let's see where we get.
my only art is code, its GPLed and so far, its worked out pretty well :)