21 Jan
2005
21 Jan
'05
11:32 a.m.
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:52 , Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas(a)gmx.net> sent:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:12:27 -0600
Jan Depner eviltwin69(a)cableone.net> wrote:
Yes. Take a look at the filesystem tests section on this page. Mark Knecht did
a few tests and the results are very interesting.
http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/Arcana.html
Jan
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 07:00, Florian Schmidt
wrote:
what kind of problems? You mean, because the journal is on another part
of the disk, the head has to move a lot while writing? (writing data -
updating journal - writing data - updating journal...) On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:02:28 -0800 (PST)
R Parker rtp405(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
The hournal is not with the file. This causes problems when the
file is written to. I'm hesitant about returning to ext2 because
I've had
fsck blow up in my face more than once...guess that's
why I rsync to a big IDE HD. I do expect ext2
performance to be perfectly acceptable.
what's wrong with ext3?
flo
--
Palimm Palimm!