7 May
2006
7 May
'06
5:58 a.m.
On Sun, 7 May 2006 01:48:51 -0400
Rob <lau(a)kudla.org> wrote:
On Sun May 7 2006 01:28, Lee A. Azzarello wrote:
I think the bottom line is that, whatever the fine details are, anyone
who wants to retain a semblance of control over their creative work
should avoid this organisation like it were the plague.
I have looked at their home page twice now. I will NEVER go there
again, unless someone tells me they think they have seen some of my
work on there.
--
F
other local Brooklyn bands. Because of this
license they can
release the compilation album and sell it from a "sublicencee"
company without notifying the bands who composed or performed
the music. They own this product through and through. The
bands might not be entitled to a percentage of the profit
unless they or their laywers get involved. That's the point.
And what I'm saying is that I think they and their sublicencees
would have to only distribute said album through myspace.com in
order to satisfy the "on or through the Service" part of the
terms. But I guess it's ambiguous enough that it'd have to go
to court, and lord only knows they'll change it again before
that happens.
Rob