13 Jul
2006
13 Jul
'06
9:41 p.m.
Loki Davison wrote:
ARRG you used the bad words!!!! AMS?
I agree that AMS is buggy, and that om in many ways are better. But I
must admit that I found AMS even more fun/easy to work with than om. Esp
if you stick to the build-in modules in AMS, the modules work together
really smoothly. I know that defect, no-common-conventions, generic
interfaces LADSPA plugins isn't om's fault, but it's still part of the
user-experience.
But of course the buggyness and fact that it's unmaintained makes AMS
totally unusable for me too.
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk | quartet: http://www.anagrammer.dk
http://www.atte.dk/gps | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions