22 May
2016
22 May
'16
11:59 a.m.
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 08:32:45PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
I should clarify: I do like to use M/S matrixing to
control the
width of a stereo image, and M/S is a godsend when you have to fix a
master after the fact.
But otherwise I think that M/S eqing and compression are a bit of a
fashion thing and highly overrated, unless the goal is for creative
_distortion_ of a stereo sum. I don't mean that in a judgmental
sense, only in the sense that anything you accomplish by MS
processing will be artificial, not "high-fidelity":
Most music production isn't about fidelity to start with.
M/S processing of a multitrack mix isn't that different from
using EQ or dynamics on the same. Normally it shouldn't be
necessary - you can achieve the same or a better result by
adjusting the mix. But it may just be more convenient, as it
can be for EQ or dynamics.
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)