23 Aug
2009
23 Aug
'09
6:34 p.m.
Jesse Chappell wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Gabriel M.
Beddingfield<gabriel(a)teuton.org> wrote:
Let me first say that I really like FW's approach to multiple
simultaneous loops. In many ways I wish SL had a different design
than it ended up with. Not needing to care a priori about the loop
count is really nice.
As for a MIDI implementation out of the box... doesn't that just put
the burden of configuring your hardware to match it? I find that
setting/changing the bindings in SL (especially with midi learn) to be
a bit easier. I could easily include a selection of default midi
binding presets with SL, if I thought there was some common setup that
would actually be useful to people. Feel free to send me some!
Does sooperlooper supports a dance pad like fweelin does?
\r
GUI do
you think would help the sooperlooper experience? FW's gui is
very much tied to that app, regarding the waveform updating, etc.
What's nice is that, out of the box, there's about 16 loops that I
can have
laid out in front of me, visually, to trigger or record or whatever. For
someone just in to looping... FW gives a nice and fairly intuitive GUI. No
sync options, a MIDI implementation out of the box, etc.