24 Nov
2008
24 Nov
'08
4:32 a.m.
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Pieter Palmers wrote:
Indeed. But I still run gutsy, which is why I built gutsy packages.
I would be glad to setup a hardy/intrepid/... repo, but it's not easy if
you don't have it installed. Is it?
Pieter
Hi,
The FFADO team is proud to announce the first release candidate for
FFADO 2.0.
This release candidate is intended to collect feedback about the library
under wide-spread usage. The code should be free of major bugs.
We are looking for packagers that are interested in creating packages
for their favorite distribution. Please contact us if you can help us
out with this.
Release and download information:
http://www.ffado.org/?q=release/rc1
Currently, the installation options are:
* manual build from source
[http://www.ffado.org/?q=release/rc1]
* semi-automatic build from source into a 'sandbox'
[http://subversion.ffado.org/wiki/SandboxInstalls]
* APT repository for Ubuntu Gutsy and Hardy (possibly others)
[http://www.ffado.org/?q=release/apt]
Please test and report issues at our TRAC at http://subversion.ffado.org/
or at the mailing list (ffado-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net). Please take
note of http://subversion.ffado.org/wiki/WritingGoodTickets when
reporting bugs.
We ask all users of FreeBoB that are not yet testing FFADO to try this
release candidate. Note that FFADO can co-exist with FreeBoB without any
problems, so you can revert back to your original setup very easily.
Enjoy,
Pieter Palmers
ffado.org
_
Thanks.
It would be more logic imho if there will be a apt repo for Hardy
instead of Gutsy... Hardy is more recent and an LTS version...