Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Frustrated bigtime

On 8/26/05, Lee Revell <rlrevell(a)joe-job.com> wrote: So we are from "terrible idea...why would you..." to "do it like this..." Well, it's an improvement. rc7 seems to be viable on amd64. I did it like above and it worked so I also tried it two different ways to make sure it wasn't something in my procedure that broke it last time...not that it still couldn't be. Downloading the kernel 2.6.13-rc7 and patching it works. Running an emerge on the vanilla sources, which actually does the above, and patching them works (though you have to add ~amd64 to the keywords). I have only tested compilation, I have not booted one yet. So, two days ago with rc6 it couldn't be done the second two ways (didn't try the first). Now with rc7 all the sudden it can. That is odd but not outside the realm of possibility with a "testing" kernel. rc6 blew up in sched.c only a few seconds into a compile complaining about various symbols being undefined and/or redefined, rc7 makes it through with only some deprication warnings that seem to be in all kernels these days. I fully expect it to work fine on bootup. At any rate I now have a few working preemtable kernels. I don't figure on needing another. I'm moving on to figuring other things out. I almost didn't make this one but I figured having a compile report destined for the developer was worth the effort even if it wouldn't work for me...and it ended up working instead.