On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:03:52PM -0500, Lee Revell
wrote:
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:45 -0800, Kjetil S.
Matheussen wrote:
That is rediculous. Do you really have to start
program that way
to get realtime priority? In case, I guess (and _really_ hope)
that realtime-lsm (or something similar) will continue to exist for a
long time still.
Yes, absolutely, it is ridiculous.
Is it really ? If you start apps via an icon or menu, you
don't see any difference at all. If you use a terminal
to start them, just define an alias. Having a prefix such
as nice, sudo, or rt_limits -r is not really worse than
having options (IMHO).
No, it's not that bad, but IMHO it's more of a pain than the realtime
LSM, or the PAM solution. It's just too confusing for users when there
are 3 different ways to do the same thing for no apparent reason. So
I'm recommending they stick with realtime LSM until the new rlimits are
fully supported by most distros.
Lee