28 Jan
2011
28 Jan
'11
10:59 a.m.
Am 28.01.2011 02:17, schrieb Josh Lawrence:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Hartmut
Noack<zettberlin(a)linuxuse.de> wrote:
After some searching on the website I found this too. The attribution is
perfectly adeaquate and decent.
So I apologize for insinuating malice and decline to mere ahhhmmm stupi....
1.) a simple hint to that note at the very end of your 5-page
release-notes would have choked this ugly discussion in no time.
2.) not to hide that note at the end of a 5-page release-note but to put
it in a place where it can be seen at first glance would have hindered
the discussion altogether.
I still wonder, why you have fought so rabidly -- I mean, you had the
appropriate notice on your site (havent you?)-- why bother fighting for
a silly right not to have it?
best regards
HZN/Berlin
So I guess, most people will notice that and many
will ask themselfs: "Why
do these people use to talk about their own hard work and do not care to
mention the work of the Muse-people?"
this isn't my fight, but I just checked out the code and found this:
OOM2 is developed from the base code of MusE (Muse Sequencer) written
by the mighty Werner Schweer,
and maintained and modified to the present day, by the current Muse2
maintainer Robert Jonsson and his team.
We not only willingly credit Werner for his code, but add our deepest
respect and admiration as well.