On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 06:33:03 -1000
david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Hartmut Noack wrote:
Am 08.02.2011 09:15, schrieb david:
> Hartmut Noack wrote:
>> Am 08.02.2011 08:35, schrieb david:
>>> Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>> On 02/07/2011 04:40 PM, Mike Cookson wrote:
>>>>> For non-realtime (including non-linear, like montage) processing you
>>>>> need only plugins (ladspa, lv2, vamp) and some editor like Audacity,
>>>>> mhWaveEdit or something other.
>>>>>
>>>>> For realtime (also called
>>>>> non-destructive editing... hm, probably, they are right :) you need
>>>>> set of various software, that could be used at one time and be
>>>>> connected each to other).
>>>> real-time effects processing and non-destructive editing often go hand
>>>> in hand, but note that
>>>>
>>>> "non-destructive" means that the original [audio] data will
never be
>>>> modified. Any edit/effect/modifications are saved as new files (or
>>>> remebered as application-settings operating on the original data).
>>>>
>>>> audio-editors (rezound, audacity, sweep, etc) are usually destructive:
>>>> load file, apply effect, save file -> original file is gone.
>>> Audacity is import audio file, apply effect, save project (optional),
>>> export in chosen format. It never replaces the original file.
>> So there is a major dfference between audiofiles, you have imported
>> and audiofiles, you have recorded with audacity -- correct?
> No, I never have. I usually use JACK, and have never been able to make
> Audacity work with JACK. I've only done the following things with
> Audacity:
>
> 1. Import 16 tracks of 32-bit WAV files (recorded on another machine
> from my church band's Firewire interface using some Windows software)
> and do basic mixing.
>
> 2. Trim and cleanup voice audio recordings made on my PDA.
>
> 3. Trim and convert wave files recorded using jack_capture.
>
> 4. Pitch shift prerecorded MP3s if needed for band members who play
> solely by ear (if the recording's in Eb and we're playing it in D,
> they're lost).
>
> If you have the time and brains needed to learn Ardour, go for it!
>
I think it is a myth, that Ardour is too complicated to learn for a
beginner.
Perhaps it's a myth for others. I responded only from my own
experience.
There are plenty of folk here who use Ardour and do wonderful things
with it. Advanced features? I couldn't tell an advanced feature from a
basic feature. I couldn't even figure out to simply record anything with
it, and Ardour's "automagic" setup didn't seem to include that
connection.
No insult to Ardour, I'm no audio techno whiz. I figured I'd wait til
Ardour 3 is released and I have the time to learn it.
I had exactly the same experience. Twice over a two year period!
These days I either record with timemachine, then process later in audacity, or
record directly into Rosegarden, where I usually have associated MIDI tracks.