5 Mar
2010
5 Mar
'10
7:58 a.m.
Gerald Mwangi wrote:
Hi, I've played arround with LASH, and it seems to
do what it was ment
for. Hydrogen and Zynadd already support it, and I think Ardour too. So
its not about LASH its self, but about the apps that use it. If I were
to push LASH developement, it wouldn't change anything. I mean to force
audio apps, which use Jack, to use LASH as well. For me it is super
important, to be able to save the whole session with one click. There
are so many standalone jack apps out there, which I'd like to use for
recording. I simply don't rewiring everything that belongs to project
everytime I work on it.
Imho you better could use Ladish then LASH atm. I enjoy
using it myself.
http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/apps/all/ladish
You could also take a look into this:
http://digitaldub.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/linux-audio-session-scripting/
There are some proposals for a minimal session handler within Jack. It's
clear that users needs session handling, it's up to the devs to make a
good plan for it. I think they understand the need of users now.
So as a musicians I suggest you to look at the available options, choose
one and just wait and pray for more and/ or new developments in this
area. Your point is clear and taken.
\r