3 Feb
2007
3 Feb
'07
10 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ken Restivo schrieb:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 09:57:16AM +0100, Michael
Bohle wrote:
native Linux-VST may be nice but still there would be
Licence-Restrictions so having LADSPA being made more powerfull is much
better in the long run.
VST is great, powerfull, well-designed etc but I want freedom - so
LADSPA and DSSI is all we have now - VST has no future for people
thinking the free software way ...
> how would U-He get paid to do that?
No need for. A young talented hacker from Italy
named Kunitoki has realised
the potential of native vst on linux, ported zynadd and by the way he cleaned
up the UI:
Thats inside the great energyXT2 - the first
native VST host for linux with
now 40 native VST plugs.
Uhhh did I say Yahwe? energyXT2 is closed
software.
Heh, wrong direction.
I was suggesting recruiting people who were wasting their time cracking closed software,
to instead port/clone closed VST instruments to work on LADSPA/DSSI on Linux.
It would be exactly backwards to port/clone closed, proprietary "VST hosts" to
run on Linux. I wouldn't advise that at all.
-ken -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFxT5Z1Aecwva1SWMRAvSbAKCJ5egbc+58ANkjqfbV+VCaZ5RGhACeN11O
Oq5Cy3SLPmRbIChl0/K7RFw=
=77Up
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----