8 Jan
2003
8 Jan
'03
6:21 p.m.
Hi,
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 19:37:39 -0500 (EST) ben-extra(a)MIT.EDU wrote:
[..]
My attempt was to produce a mono recording at 8000
samples per second.
marit@chipmunk:/var/tmp$ sox -V test.au -c 1 -r 8000 test.wav polyphase
sox: Detected file format type: au
sox: Found Sun/NeXT magic word
sox: Input file test.au: using sample rate 11025
size shorts, encoding signed (2's complement), 2 channels
sox: Input file test.au: comment "test.au"
sox: Writing Wave file: Microsoft PCM format, 1 channel, 8000 samp/sec
sox: 16000 byte/sec, 2 block align, 16 bits/samp
sox: Output file test.wav: using sample rate 8000
size shorts, encoding signed (2's complement), 1 channel
sox: Output file: comment "test.au"
*******
The resulting file sizes are then:
-r--r--r-- 1 marit marit 527881224 Jan 6 15:43 test.au
-rw-r--r-- 1 marit marit 191521568 Jan 7 19:13 test.wav
I am open to any suggestions. I wasn't expecting 3.5 hours of
low-quality audio to be 200 MB, but maybe I am naive. Am I using the
wrong tool? As a separate question: How much space would I save using
mp3 or ogg encoding?
There is no mistake. It's a simple calculation: 3.5 hours is 210 minutes
or 12600 seconds. 8000 samples per second, each sample being 16 bits (or
2 bytes) gives: 12600*8000*2 = 201600000 or 200 MByte.
Personally, my suggestion would be to go for a lossy format, and try
Ogg/Vorbis (http://www.vorbis.com) which is supposed to be very good
especially at low bitrates. Typically an .ogg should be about 1/10th
of the original filesize, with low bitrates probably even lower than
that (but my experiences are with CD quality, not with mono/8kHz
material).
Hope that helps,
Frank